Unfair Blaming of Home Inspectors
The House Detective by Barry Stone, Certified Home Inspector
Dear Barry: As a home inspector for many years, I’ve been caught in the “you-broke-it,–you-pay-to-fix-it” bind. My question is simple: When is a home inspector responsible for things that break? Tile roofs are not designed to be walked on, so a home inspector should pay for tiles that break under foot. But I’ve been asked to repair wood trim because I pushed my finger through some dryrot. I’ve paid for faucets that would not turn off after being operated, for a garage door that disconnected from its track when I tested it, and for a casement window that fell from its frame when opened. Is it right for home inspectors to bear the costs of such repairs? Marshall
Read Barry’s response here.



I don’t think home inspectors should answer all of it its mainly because the main duty of inspectors is to inspect so if any part of the house gets broken, it just tells that there should be fixing needed.